AI Chief of Staff
brings clarity, speed, and accountability, so you can focus on moving the company forward, while your agent handles the rest behind the scenes.
Orchestria's Chief of Staff is your second layer of operational clarity — tracking what matters so you can lead with focus and speed
![[headshot] image of customer (for a home inspector)](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/684b5ef94a654ecf2dac6ef5/686ee4a38f5cfa31fc6ffd95_6b4ecfca-533e-4a3a-b003-407c3917d1fb.avif)
Concise, personalized updates on today’s meetings, blockers, metrics, and decisions.
Summarized agendas, attendees, past context, and relevant reports — before every meeting.
Auto-tracks to-dos from meetings and emails, assigns them, and follows up until resolved.
Keeps your top 3–5 weekly/monthly priorities visible, aligned, and moving forward.
Checks live KPIs and nudges responsible owners if they’re off track.
Synthesizes updates from team huddles, flags red/yellow risks, and highlights unknowns.
These 6 workflows don’t just support — they simulate what a high-functioning Chief of Staff would do if embedded full-time.
These are the invisible bottlenecks that bleed time, clarity, and alignment.
When automated or AI-assisted, each one saves hours weekly and keeps priorities on track.
Calendar, Notion, Slack, and dashboards all capture pieces, but none orchestrate across time, ownership, and intent.
Great execs want clarity, confidence, and capacity — not more info. These workflows give them that.
Get answers to common questions about Orchestria's Chief of Staff, your second brain for high-performing leadership.
Will it track the right things, or just give me noise? Is it more inbox, not less?
It only surfaces what’s tied to your actual priorities, decisions, and owned outcomes.
My head of ops wants raw data. My CFO wants 3-line summaries. Can this adjust to style?
Yes. The system calibrates by stakeholder — you get synthesis, they get depth.
They do half of this — why would I need more?
An EA helps. This gives you orchestration across systems, people, and outcomes. It complements, not replaces.
I’ve seen tools that collapse when things go off-script.
This engine tracks context over time, adapts across tools, and escalates when ambiguity shows up — just like a real Chief of Staff would.
If it follows up on the wrong thing, I lose credibility.
You remain in control. The agent flags, summarizes, and proposes — you approve before it acts in your name.
Does this reduce headcount or just add another layer?
It doesn’t add a layer. It gives you back hours, prevents mistakes, and keeps your priorities moving. That’s executive ROI.
AI-powered support for executive teams. Streamline decisions, drive clarity, and accelerate results.
